• 103
  • More
Replies (5)
    • Interesting!

      The obsolete humans?

      A way of saying that humans are no longer needed, and the few that are wanted, must do as they are told.

      • Prakriti keeps changing her target and makes human run as pleasure seeking rats. Nothing is permanent in this world.

        All the education that prakriti gives to educate humans and the same prakriti makes it irrelevant and changes the direction.

        • Interesting view from one of the leaders in the technology field. AI has made the IT field extremely volatile. With all interested parties concerned for future stability. This is a constant topic of discussion amongst peers. In my current field of networking, there are already plugins and APIs that allow for AI chatbots like ChatGpt to access, configure and execute commands virtually by merely telling it to do so in plaintext. These are tasks that otherwise require human beings to execute them physically. This required an understanding of the syntax and operating systems of the networking devices being used.

          So the networkers are scrambling and thinking of the next leg up. This situation is the same for those in cybersecurity and other fields. For example, Cisco acquired Splunk some time last year and endeavored to implement their cybersecurity software platform into their portfolio. Splunk’s data platform was a dominant force in the cybersecurity field. Cisco thought it would allow them to remain relevant in the current market by upgrading their systems with Splunk’s robust software features, making their network and server devices multipurpose.

          In a discussion, someone mentioned that a human would be required to program the two different softwares from Cisco devices and Splunk to communicate. Somebody has to bridge that gap. And if some AI is instructed to do so. When errors are made, a person with an understanding of programming will be required to debug those issues. AI isn’t some magic box, it is a computer system programmed to execute certain instructions. Thus it is prone to errors as well, as we’ve seen in the public where it produces incorrect answers. And sometimes even socially biased responses based on the parameters its original programmers configured it to operate within.

          There are many technical factors that are just way above my intelligence. Nevertheless, in my opinion, it seems that only those who understand computer programming and some relevant language may have a shot in the IT field. But even this might be some idealistic view and a cling for hope of any future relevancy. 

          • Purposeful ignorance is a part of it. But who will be the victim who will be assigned to remain in ignorance.

            Someone designs a car but he is in a world where horses and donkeys are the means of transportation. He has to convince people that horses are a problem. They will have an easier time if they kill their horses, extract their money from the bank and purchase the cars.

            Then he has to explain to them that the working of the car is his problem. They do not need to understand how the car operates because he will do the repairs at their expense.

            They should only learn how to use the car, not to repair nor maintain it.

            That is how money is made.

            • A clever ruse! Concuted by a formidable architect.

            Login or Join to comment.