Group Liberation

There are many ideas about liberation, as to what it is, as to who is eligible for it and as to what destination or lack of that is involved in it. My information is that group liberation is fallacious, totally impractical and is a nonsensical proposal which is not backed by any rational evidence.

There is a desire for unity among humans as for instance the most persistent ones are the unity of an infant and its mother and that of someone who is in love with someone else. However we experience that nature ruptures these unities over and over. Despite our determination to make favorable social relationships into something cohesive which will stand the test of time, there is absolutely no evidence that nature has any intentions of supporting the idea. And that means psychic mature not the physical one.

Definitely the physical nature has no respect for our social ideas of unity because it repeatedly disrupts the social formations and continue in its plan to develop and destroy whatever will be.

As for liberation, that idea as a group accomplishment is a wholesale farce. If anything, each person would have to be liberated individually and not as a collective. In every aspect of nature where we see unity, it turns out to be a fabrication, a product of disunity making a show of unity. In this usage disunity is not a negative term but it is a fact of circumstance and is a definition of reality.

Answer this question:

If a nuclear bomb is detonated in a crowded city, the way an atom bomb was detonated over Hiroshima, would all those individuals who were killed experience a collective unified disintegration of social self and body?