Subtle Body Relationship Interchangeability

I discussed this topic before and mentioned this in many books. It pertains to the subtle body. If understood correctly, it allows the student break away from conventional morality and sociology. If as Christianity posits, everyone will live once, then die once and then will be resurrected from the dead either to be blessed as a child of God or to be condemned to hell as a deviant, then it makes all the sense in the world that morality and sociology should be linear, should be constant such that my father will forever be my father and my mother will eternally remain so. Such will be my child.

However we do not buy into this idea of one life, one death. I experience the subtle body. It is not subjected to death as the physical system is. It is subjected to trauma at death of the physical body but it is not terminated.

I had an astral encounter recently with a lady whom I knew some forty plus years ago. This person was deceased now for over fifteen years. Looking at her subtle body I would estimate that she was deceased for at least ten years and has not to date taken an embryo. She will have to take one because she does not qualify to go to higher astral world or any other place. Even hell would not accept her because she was a pious entity and did not commit the necessary crimes to be deserved of a hellish location. Her piety was earth-charged, physically focused and so it does not qualify her to live perpetually in an astral heaven or in any place higher.

The interesting thing about this lady is that her astral body is nude. I have seen her several times over some years now in the astral, off and on, not frequently. Every time she is nude. This is a person who was always well-dressed reserved and modest but now in the astral world her subtle body is always nude.

But she is not in a mood of sexuality of most modern people. Her nudeness registers as that of the aborigines. She was not an aborigine in the immediate past life but perhaps nature is preparing her for birth in an aborigine family.

Anyway, she wanted to explain to me some of her recent realization about relationships. She said this:

When I was alive on the physical side, I had no idea about the interchangeability of relationships. You tried to bring it to my attention but I was resistant because I had no view about the subtle body. I was adamant in being my physical body and as being the role I played in the family and society I was in.

Now everything is different as I realize that a physical body may experience only one relationship role in the family and society in one life, while when one takes other bodies as a human or whatever, one has to experience other relationships either in reference to the same persons from the previous life or in reference to other persons who were not present in the past life, or who were present but were not related.

In one life, one may be meaningful in the life of some person and then in some other life, one may have little or no value to that someone. In one life one may be in love, real crazy about one person and then in another life one may become the sworn enemy of that very one.

In one life one may be the parent, then in another life the child of the very same person. In one life he is the son but in some other life, he may be the husband.

None of this was realized by me when I used the last physical body. How different would life be if one were to know this while one uses a physical form? The wonder of it!