Females / Honey-Pot Effect
Meditationtime Forum Post
Date: Posted 5 years before May 17, 2018
MiBeloved 5 years ago
Some females have what is called the honey pot effect, where in the subtle body, the lower part of the trunk, from the waist down has a subtle jell which accumulates over time so that in the lower subtle trunk, there is a jell-like substance which is a pleasure energy.
If such a female gets a material body, then this system of jelling mirrors the month course for reproduction, where it fills up with this jell at a certain time in a lunar month, and then it drains out at a certain time.
For the purpose of kundalini yoga, this system of nature is used so that when it is not being drained out as during the menstrual discharge procedure, the yogini draws up, dissipates and absorbs this energy into the higher parts of the subtle body into the subtle chest under the shoulders, into the neck and the head of the subtle body.
If this is done proficiently then there is a great ease and the run effort for sexual excitement decreases considerably. The hours spent preparing for, interacting with sexual exposure and sexual receptions become greatly decreased and much energy is conserved for shifting the interest to the spiritual plane, where there are spiritual sexual fulfillments which are the ideal replacement for the sexual liaisons in the puppy love world.
In the kundalini yoga practice, the problem of having a spiritual sexual partner is not easily solved. In fact in the kundalini yoga practice, two methods are self-tantric or inside dual tantric. Self tantric means working alone to acquire sexual nourishment from the energy in the individual psyche. This is a hard achievement done after becoming very proficient at getting rid of the polarity of kundalini. Because of this, this is usually a very impractical aspect to strive for.
The best outlook is the inside dual tantric which is where the yogini (female ascetic) connects with a yogi (male ascetic) within her individual psyche and gains the fulfillments in that way without any physical satisfaction. This is a total shift of focus into the subtle body, with a loss of interest in consummating the contact into the physical system.
This gives physical satisfaction but in a way where there is no physical participation, and where in place of a fulfillment need on the physical level, there is instead a blank feeling which does not urge for physical completion. This is similar to when a person gets money deposited in a bank account by some system of in-bank deposit, where no one physically approaches a teller to deposit the money and yet the money is deposited.
In this system one of the partners enters in the psyche of the other and shares what is to be shared from within the psyche without external contact. This is ultra-subtle and is useless to persons who are externally focused into the puppy-love world. Even for advanced students it takes many months, if not years of practice, before this in-psyche love exchange takes hold and becomes a reality. In the meantime there are doubts about, and lack of fulfillment, because it occurs on a plane where the person may not have transferred her interest.
Tantra is a big topic which requires some deep consideration and complete transfer of interest from the external to the internal planes of psychic contact. Indeed, Tantra is personal and deep!
MiBeloved 5 years ago
Caroline on LinkedIn:
Any thoughts as to what happens after menopause, Michael?
MiBeloved's Response:
Caroline,
Menopause!!!!!!
Totally different topic????
But the subtle body does not have the menopause. It is a physical body thing. It does however affect one if one is physically focused. Because then the subtle body tries to mimic that physical state.
==============================
Caroline wrote:
MB, I meant since this energy is not being drained out in the monthly cycle..........is it still being produced, or does that stop?
MiBeloved's Response:
On the physical side it is not being produced. The physical system for producing that shuts down by the instruction of the life force, which also causes the system not to give pigment to hair and such other things.
This is a budget system which becomes more and more unable to pay its bills, so the services get cut more and more each day.
The life force slowly shuts down this or that and maintains just the very bare essentials in the end, even though it is not to our liking.
The life force also shuts down dream recall apparatus in the subtle body during dreams and that is why most of us have no or very little dream recall.
==============================
Caroline on LinkedIn:
If you mean the inner masculine, the animus, then yes, I think it is.
The way I read what Micheal wrote I think he is referring to an inner connection between two people who exist is the physical, but choose to interact only on the etheric level without any physical contact. Is that correct, Michael?
MiBeloved's Response:
It is an experience. It is not just theoretical. Even for physical expression between two people physically, there is subtle contact but in that case since the focus involves the physical, the subtle cannot be discerned with clarity. However if one's interest migrates to the subtle, then subtle expression may become the focus.
As you stated it is interaction only on the etheric level without physical contact.
==============================
Caroline wrote:
I think what you experienced as you have shared on this forum is, if not unique, then very nearly so, jivana. I haven't experienced anything quite like it, not even close. I think it has been a great gift to you , and as you are able to share it, it is a gift to us all, to open up possibilities within the self.
Caroline's query:
Michael, from what you wrote you are saying this is preferable to a physical engagement, correct. How does this tie in with celibacy?
MiBeloved's Response:
A physical body is like the copper aspect in an electric cable. In it current is travelling at near the speed of light. The current is not the wire, for it was then one could not insert another wire and have that new wire carry the current.
So this is similar to running the current without a wire. Since the current is not the wire and has an independent existence, it should be possible to transmit the current from place to place even without wires.
I guess one has to be psychically tech savvy to do that.
***********************
The tie with celibacy is the realization that celibacy which is a physical fact does not mean that celibacy is happening on the subtle level. A physical monk or nun say, who is guarded twenty-four hours per day where there is no self-stimulation or mutual sex, has done celibacy on the physical side, or so it appears.
But can we see what is being indulged in on the subtle side.
As soon as one sincerely takes up physical celibacy, one begins to admit this to oneself and then the real fun begins as one is then facing reality.
Marcia Beloved 5 years ago
MiBeloved wrote:
The best outlook is the inside dual tantric which is where the yogini (female ascetic) connects with a yogi (male ascetic) within her individual psyche and gains the fulfillments in that way without any physical satisfaction. This is a total shift of focus into the subtle body, with a loss of interest in consummating the contact into the physical system.
Marcia Beloved's comment:
I reread this thread and it seems that there are several overlapping perspectives even within Michael's post.
Is this tantric procedure a way of dovetailing physical sex and consummating a physical urge in the psyche instead?
By psyche, do you mean the entire subtle body with all the chakras and subtle brain, kundalini and all the adjuncts?
Is the dual tantric a bridge which when crossed successfully, leads to total psyche purification at which point the sexual cravings and fulfillments no longer exist?
MiBeloved 5 years ago
Marcia Beloved wrote:
Is this tantric procedure a way of dovetailing physical sex and consummating a physical urge in the psyche instead?
MiBeloved's Response:
It does involve sublimating not consummating a physical urge and getting to the root cause of the urge which lies in the subtle body and not in the physical one. The physical body is here because of its precursor which is the subtle body. Therefore the real target is the subtle body.
So long as the physical is in focus, one cannot see the underlying basis which is the subtle body. If one retreats from the physical fulfillments, one will be left with the real cause which is the subtle body. Then one can see how to deal with that using subtle means alone without physical back-up or supplement.
==============================
Marcia Beloved wrote:
By psyche, do you mean the entire subtle body with all the chakras and subtle brain, kundalini and all the adjuncts?
MiBeloved's Response:
Psyche in this usage does mean the entire subtle body with all the chakras and subtle brain, kundalini and all the adjuncts.
==============================
Marcia Beloved wrote:
Is the dual tantric a bridge which when crossed successfully, leads to total psyche purification at which point the sexual cravings and fulfillments no longer exist?
MiBeloved's Response:
Dual tantric in most cases is a shaky dangling and very dangerous bridge, which I do not recommend to anyone, even though I made this post. It is like handling weapons. Even the most adept munitions experts wound themselves or wound others wrongly on occasion because with weapons there is always that risk.
With sex there is the ever present danger of it digressing into wanton vulgarity which may degrade the individual concerned.
And yet, for instance weapons cannot be eliminated from the face of the earth. Suppose Sir Paul was elected as the President of the United States, then the first thing he would do is to confiscate all weapons and ban any production.
But weapons are such a part of material existence that his ban will do nothing to stop the use of weapons. We are born with weapons as parts of our bodies and as our bodies themselves. So Sir Paul would then have to remove our teeth, declaw all the birds and beast, starve us so that our muscles would go limber and we would be so weak that we could not use our bodies to take advantage of each other.
In the same way sex is dangerous but it cannot be eliminated. We have to deal with it despite the risks.
Look at your statement again:
Is the dual tantric a bridge which when crossed successfully, leads to total psyche purification at which point the sexual cravings and fulfillments no longer exist?
This statement is flawed because it assumes that in a purified psyche would not have sexual needs. Until we can prove that the question floats in the air over our head and we cannot answer it.
I can say this much that what has to be removed are particular types of sexual access, those which cause an eventual degradation of the persons concerned. In all respects pertaining to all habits one has to locate the portions of the habits which are spiritual detrimental and which takes one away from the spiritual focus to an obsession with material existence.
Spiritual sexual exchange is a reality in the spiritual dimensions but it is not based on genital interaction because the spiritual body itself, the whole of it acts like a sexually inflamed genital, such that eye contact, thought contact or any other type of spiritual sensual contact produced the desired pleasure.
In the material world however things are designed so that the genitals have acquired a lopsided importance in relation to pleasure. This keeps us time bound in this dimension constantly seeking the pleasure fulfillment of the physical organs concerned.
Marcia Beloved 5 years ago
Thank you for the clarification.
Please allow me to inquire a little further based on your response:
* Is it correct to conclude that the stress on physical and subtle celibacy in higher yoga practice, is basically only relevant in the quest to reaching states of consciousness and attaining supernatural vision, which will enable one to make a final exit out of the material worlds?
* And that the application of celibacy as recommended in ancient texts such as Patanjali’s Sutras, only applies in the material dimensions or in the siddha realms since in those places one is still attempting to refine the subtle body to make it completely compatible with a spiritual dimension?
* And that upon gaining entrance into spiritual existence, celibacy as a concept is irrelevant and does not even exist as a concept, due to the fact that everyone is perfectly situated in their individual existential role which may or may not include sexual expression or exchange?
Further:
Michael responded to below statement:
Is the dual tantric a bridge which when crossed successfully, leads to total psyche purification at which point the sexual cravings and fulfillments no longer exist?
This statement is flawed because it assumes that in a purified psyche would not have sexual needs. Until we can prove that the question floats in the air over our head and we cannot answer it. (end of Michael's response)
Marcia Beloved's comment:
I have assumed that all cravings, not just sexual cravings and fulfillments, must cease before one can attain kaivalam, segregation of the core self from the psyche adjuncts, and become qualified to transit to a permanent spiritual place.
Are you saying that some of the core selves have an innate spiritual sexuality which will be a part of their eventual spiritual existence when liberation is achieved?
MiBeloved 5 years ago
More or less what you concluded is correct but there are exceptions. Therefore one has to go light-footed with this and not make it into a dogma or a rule of thumb.
The thing to remember about spiritual dimensions or supernatural place of deities is that the only way you can exist there is if you are completely compatible with the ideas of the deity. You cannot even see or perceive the place if you are not. And if, let us say, you are compatible for 2 seconds in one million years, then for those two seconds you will be with the deity and then for the rest of that one million years you will be somewhere else.
My experience proves this. In this life I was with Krishna the blue cowherd boy with the spiritual bliss emanating body for about 4 minutes say, and that was it. I was there in his spiritual dimension in a corresponding spiritual body. But in my whole life so far of 60+ years with so many minutes, there were only 4 minutes of compatibility.
-
- · Arpana Ukkund
- ·
Continued from above…
You cannot demand a relationship with the deity. The relations with the particular deity in that particular divine place is already set up. All you can do is to fit in. Others must also fit in, in the way that is compatible with the ideas of the deity.
There is no disunity or disharmony with a deity in the deity’s realms in the spiritual worlds. There is no opportunity to dissent or resent or whatever, because one will just not be there so there will arise no occasion of disharmony.
In this world there is disharmony and dissent against Brahma the deity in whose mental energy we exist in. We do not have to agree with him and still we may go on existing at least so long as his mental energy holds up, but in the divine world this sort of thing does not occur.
==============================
Thus, as you wrote, the core selves do have an innate spiritual sexuality which will be a part of their eventual spiritual existence when liberation is achieved. However the application of that is what we have to look at. In one spiritual world Yashoda is not the mother of Krishna. She might be in another role and that is it. But in the material world in Vrindvana she served as the mother of Krishna. We hear that Balarama, the elder brother of Krishna in their life on earth, was really a divine serpent bed of Krishna in a divine world. We also hear that in the spiritual Vrindavana this same Balarama is a cowherd boy who has a form that seems to be the elder of Krishna.
So the swarupa or spiritual form of the individual has to do with the particular spiritual province in which the individual appears.
In their life on earth, Rukmini was the principal spouse of Krishna but in the spiritual Vrindavana she may not be allowed to pick flowers which are to be offered to Krishna. She may be told by the gopis, “Please do not walk here picking flowers. What do you think? Why are you so arrogant? Run along. Sweep the path before us.”
In one higher astral world, a certain yogi guru is honored like a king, like a god, but in the divine world, he might be like a spiritual insect, a total nobody. We do not know our significance or insignificance to the deity.
When I am with Lord Shiva, I am just a boy of about 7 years of age. I have no sexual interest in anything. I do not see any females except sometimes we see the Goddess Durga and then she is like a stern detached mother, because she is not very fond of her yogi sons because they are stupid when it comes to understanding the needs of women.
So it depends on which deity and where and how one will fit in according to the ideas of the deity.
As a yogi boy with Lord Shiva everything is very nice but when the Goddess shows up everyone turns quiet because we cannot predict what she will say or do and who she will send away for whatever reason that comes to her mind.
When we are with the Brahma deity, we do not have to fear anybody. There is no woman there like the goddess Durga and so there we are free to be ourselves as boy-sons of Brahma.
It hinges on the particular deity and how one fits into to the existence in that realm.
Marcia Beloved 5 years ago
You have discussed the possibility of so many different roles and destinations! It almost sounds like a person could already have been situated in a spiritual existence, but is now in the material world. Does this apply only to entities who were always divine, but who are also assigned to come down into material existence from time to time?
One example you gave is Mother Yashoda:
In one spiritual world Yashoda is not the mother of Krishna. She might be in another role and that is it. But in the material world in Vrindvana she served as the mother of Krishna.
I wonder, is it possible that I already was spiritually situated, but am now, for some specific reason, stuck in material existence?
I always assumed that I am just a single core self, with a single subtle body, that I originated in the brahman effulgence, was never in the spiritual world but was flung into the material cosmos from the brahman effulgence and attracted a kundalini psyche tag, and that if I can purify the subtle body totally, then I can be elevated to a spiritual dimension, will be a spiritual entity and have a specified role there, which will be completely and eternally harmonious.
My tendency is to desperately oversimplify spiritual concepts, because I actually am afraid to acknowledge the possible enormity of subtle and spiritual existence.
Maybe what I really am wondering about, is this:
* Am I simultaneously more than one person at a time? Do I have expansions? Am I performing multiple roles at once?
* Can a person be a spiritual entity in a spiritual dimension, and at the same time be a core self in material existence, with a kundalini that is domineering oneself?
Are these speculations of mine, just a crazy application of imagination by the buddhi organ?
MiBeloved 5 years ago
Marcia Beloved's Query:
Am I simultaneously more than one person at a time? Do I have expansions? Am I performing multiple roles at once?
Can a person be a spiritual entity in a spiritual dimension, and at the same time be a core self in material existence, with a kundalini that is domineering oneself?
Are these speculations of mine, just a crazy application of imagination by the buddhi organ?
MiBeloved's Response:
You are not more than one person at a time but you are one person who is supported or propped by different realities from time to time. And you cannot be a person without props.
Depending on the props that is who you are. Unless one is an absolute being or a Personality of Godhead, one is reliant on existential props. In the Krishna Cosmic Body book, we hear about a yogi, Markandeya who got propped by infant Krishna, the divine boy, but then the boy deity did not want to support the yogi like that forever and re-transferred the yogi into the existential jurisdiction of Brahma, the local creator-god. So that means that Markandeya’s existence is always qualified by props.
From your perspective it may be that you are becoming different persons all the time but actually you are the same core-self which exhibits this or that qualities according to the props or supports.
The core-self is like a translucent clear crystal and it assumes the colors (qualities) of whatever shines on it. Those are its supports. The crystal feels pink when a pink light is near it and it feels blue when an aquamarine light is near it.
chris_hall1951 5 years ago
Simply esoteric conceptions and ideas, but I thank you very much Michael for clearing up whatever the issues were, with your super lucid explanations.
What more can you do. You can bring the horse or horses to the water source for them to drink, but that is the beginning and end of that. From the point on the horse is on it's on.
It actions will then be determined by how much does it really need the water, or let's put it this way, how freaking thirsty is the animal?
Enuff said!