Abortion as we understand it is the negation of a beginning new life form, not a life. The core-self interpreted as soul by others is eternal, never born or killed.

But any manner to deny a self it's providentially assigned bodily form is killing, regardless of the developmental stage or relative location to a womb, egg or other, this includes animal bodily forms as well.

Somehow however, it is political issue the world over. Women are emancipated and do not want to be seen as vessels of life against their will.  

But regarding the decisions of the majority conservative court, isn’t it contradictory to rule for life of a foetus and prioritize gun freedom over gun murders, But politics is more about interests than reason.

As soon as tech becomes able to handle gestation, it is clear that it will quickly be adopted as a preferred means of carrying a child to term. I wonder why they haven't prioritized artificial wombs thus far. I am just being analytical not siding here.

Though as a being endowed with a male spyche in this life cycle, I can muse myself with the question of, if I would easily lend my body to grow another individual, even when I see it as a inconvenience to my self-centered existence.

Therefore human reproduction should involve both a father and a mother. In cases where a father is unfit as in the case of rape, it may require great wisdom to carry such offspring to term.