Sexual resistance even though it is a monster achievement is not as big as social resistance. Sex resistance is tagged by most of the ascetic groups as the main hurdle but this idea is nonsense. However, we still have to take it seriously because until we get it out of the way, we cannot see the real culprit.

The real problem is social involvement for whatever reason, sexual or otherwise. Because sex is blatant and vulgar, a scene is made about it. It is given the tag as the most disruptive feature but this is totally untrue. The real problem is social involvement.

Okay! If you do not agree with this, the disagreement is commendable.

Even with the trees we hear that early on, there were no flowering plants on this planet. Some people who are against whatever science says feel that it incorrect. But actually, it is a proven fact if you go to where volcanoes erupt and you observe which plants live on volcanic rock at first.

But let us agree for an instance that yes, there were no flowering plants. In other words there was no obvious sexual life in plants initially. Okay!

Does that mean that the first plants which were incapable of rendering sexual involvements were more liberated then the plants which came later because those later plants were sexually involved to spread pollen from male flowers to female ones?

Sex is merely a progression but from what?

From social involvement.

Hence the problem is sociology. Initially sociology produced sexuality not the other way around. Sociology is a bigger issue.