Pleasure /Kundalini Outburst

Meditationtime Forum Post

Date:  Posted 5 years before Jun 21, 2017

MiBeloved 5 years ago

This morning during meditation, I took a look at the factor of bliss aspect which arises from the aroused kundalini force. This report has to do with why kundalini has an intense bliss aspect when it comes into the head and a very mild bliss aspect when it spreads elsewhere in the body. What is the difference? Why is there a difference? Some meditators say that the bliss aspect is homogeneous and even but rare has that been my experience.

Let us get down to basics by returning to regular life. In regular life we find that things are not equal. For instance a sweet beverage is not the same as a sour one. A mint is not the same as a toffee. Each of these has specific aspects which we experience and which caused them to be categorized. It is very obvious when one begins a commercial venture, like say starting a candy manufacturing business. If then one wants to pretend that all flavors are equal and that one does not matter in preference to another, and if one wants to sell sour candies while telling people that it is all the same as sweet ones and that it is all equal and homogeneous, one will quickly come to bankruptcy.

Even in the body, modern researchers show that even in terms of tasting, it is not equally received in the body. A particular part of the tongue handles salt taste another part sweet tastes and each of these area have particular type of specialized cells. Nature is involved in specialization and distinction more than anything else. In respect to that I want this conversation to keep in touch with nature and not run off into some nameless faceless define-less absolute anything.

In this research I checked on the fact that when the kundalini rises into the head, it has an intense bliss aspect which is usually not felt anywhere else in the body, unless that other part of the body is connected to the brain area when it is felt. This is supported by nature’s normal operation, say in sex indulgence. We find that only in sex indulgence is there that intense pleasure experience. Why is this so? Why not have a sex experience at the finger tip alone intensely. Why not stimulate the elbow and experience a climax there. Strangely there are a few individuals in the world whose bodies might do that, as in the case of special sexual fetishes.

In this research I found that the missing ingredient is the buddhi intellect organ. In other words, whenever kundalini energy is aroused anywhere in the body, if the intellect organ is not in direct contact with that energy, there will be a sensation, a sort of electric sensation but there will be no intensity of that energy. And the same thing is true about sexual indulgence, except that in sexual indulgence, the kundalini is able to forcibly pull the buddhi intellect organ out of the head of the body into the genital area. But as soon as the energy is expended, the buddhi returns to the head, usually in a depressed state or mood.

When doing the breath infusion there might be a rise of kundalini, say in one arm or say in the left side of the trunk of the body, and it will be there and will be noticed as a special sensation but it will not have the intensity because the buddhi intellect organ is not directly involved in it.

This means that in our present configuration, the psyche cannot experience intense pleasure unless the buddhi organ and the kundalini are experiencing that pleasure together.

A person can, for instance be happy in the head without sexual excitement. But if we add sexual excitement to happiness, then it is a whole different thing, an exponential rise in the intensity. A person can also be happy in the genitals in the sense of a genital arousal but if there is no mental involvement with it, it is not as intense. The conclusion is that unless the two adjuncts are involved, there will be no intensity of pleasure or feelings. The intellect organ and the kundalini life force system must be brought together for a conjoint pleasure intense feeling.

Let us take a look at something that is more down to earth. Take the example of ice-cream.

Why is it that ice-cream is more tasty than the same substance if it is not frozen? Is there a difference in ice-cream which is frozen and ice-cream which is just a liquid at room temperature? Why is it that when we add the concept (as some of my friends say) of cold, of freezing, the whole thing has a different taste and texture? Freezing is not something physical which you can hold. To sense it you have to have a material which conveys it to you and then you know it is there, so it is subjective in that sense and yet it has an impact of what is objective like the liquid of ice-cream at room temperature.

The intellect which is just a concept as people say, is actually having an impact on the life force mechanism in the body to such an extent that the pleasure aspect of that life force is intensified when the intellect is fused to the life force. The sweetened milk yields more pleasure when the cold is fused to it, even though no one has ever seen physically cold except indirectly by its effects.

During breath infusion this morning, I had several small kundalini outbursts in the lower trunk of the body. I observed these and found that the missing element was the buddhi organ. Since the buddhi organ was not fused into the energy outburst of kundalini, there was no intensity even though there was an observable and definite spread of the energy. This spread was like a mild pleasant electric current spreading in some parts of the trunk of the body.