Question about Yoga inVision 1
Michael stated: On pg. 145
"There is another example. Once some weeks ago, I sat in a house after being invited by some persons. They had a daughter, a young girl about sixteen years of age. While I spoke to the parents, Yogeshwarananda shined a light through my crown chakra. He was not in the crown chakra. He was above it in another dimension. He communicated from there. Suddenly this light, like a torch light, shun through my crown chakra and shone on the daughter of those persons. I was surprised by the light. I smiled within, not showing my reaction to her parents. In my subtle head I addressed Yogeshwarananda, “It is strange that a great yogin, who is liberated and already passed beyond the need for a physical form, desires to see a teenaged girl.” In any case, he did not answer. I may add here also that the reason for the yogi, not being in my crown chakra and being above it is this: On that day my crown chakra had a cloudy energy. If it had a clear energy, he would have entered. Since the subtle energy vibrated at a lower frequency, he did not enter."
Dean's question: In the book this entry is dated June 28 1999, have you had an further insight into that thought sine then? As why Yogeshwarananda chose to appear at that moment? was there a past life relationship to that entity?
-
Somehow a liberated person may act as a normal person would. This is usually condemned as a fall for that liberated self. It would require mystic investigation to know if an ordinary act or a lowly act of a liberated person was a fall or something else.
The best attitude is to not allow the mind to judge and form an opinion about the contrary acts of a liberated person. Such matters may be left to chance, to providence, to fate, to cause return reactions to the liberated self.
If one passes a judgement then there is the likelihood that the energy released in one’s mind while doing that, may cause one to be demoted in yoga practice. Whatever a liberate self does which is contrary will be resolved by supernatural agency. Hence there is no need for an ordinary person to pass judgement.
Suppose a good man commits a criminal act and is arrested and judged by the state authorities, what is the use of forming a judgement about it. Why let the mind indulge one in being judge and jury? Everyone should be confident that nature and God has everything under wraps. We are not required. Our opinions have little or no meaning. Hence why express it while thinking or tell others about it verbally, especially since nature or God may take offense and deal with us for doing so.
Yogeshwarananda did not discuss the incidence with me. I dare not inquire of him about it. However due to mystic perception I know the reason which is in his subtle body there was an energy for checking for birth opportunities in the psyche of others. This energy acted to cause him to see the sixteen-year-old girl.
It is the type of energy which inquires like this:
- Could this be my mother if I take rebirth?
- What would she be like as an endearing parent?
- Would my passage through her psyche as an embryo cause me to lose the yoga insight?
- She is a pretty female but is her psychology harmful to me?
-
Michael Beloved wrote: The best attitude is to not allow the mind to judge and form an opinion about the contrary acts of a liberated person. Such matters may be left to chance, to providence, to fate, to cause return reactions to the liberated self. f one passes a judgement then there is the likelihood that the energy released in one’s mind while doing that, may cause one to be demoted in yoga practice. Whatever a liberate self does which is contrary will be resolved by supernatural agency. Hence there is no need for an ordinary person to pass judgement.
Dean's comment: Your point is well taken here. I was trying to view it from the angle as ordinary persons endeavoring to become liberated, this is an arduous journey and Chance, Providence, Fate, will continually to trip you up so humility is essential.
