I see there is a limitation on number of characters so I will post a series of replies.
Thank you Erinn Earth and Michael Beloved for listening to the talk and for your comments!
Although I am not an aspiring Pali Canon scholar, and pretty much focus on meditation techniques and information from meditating monk who are versed in the Canon, I will try to respond to this:
What is the proof from the Pali canon texts that anatta means that of all things that none of them is self?
I will refer you to the Anatta-lakkhana Sutta: The Discourse on the Not-self Characteristic: